Home / Opinions / Facebook criticism unprofessional

Facebook criticism unprofessional

There is an expression: “Do not throw stones if you live in a glass house.” A pretty good piece of advice, especially for people who are in the public “spotlight.”
I’m not going to lie; this is directed at a certain person: our SGA president, Kelli Cody.
I really did not want to write this – honestly, but I felt it was necessary to address the fact that I feel that students in a leadership position on campus, including myself, should be held responsible for what they say and do – even on Facebook.
On April 22, Cody posted on her wall that “[she] thinks The Spectator is a waste of trees. Stop killing the tress with your uneducated nonsense nobody reads! Happy Earth Day.”
Okay. Criticism can be a constructive thing, and The Spectator has done its fair share of criticizing, so I am all for it, but there has to be a certain level of professionalism.
Is criticizing another student entity over a Facebook status professional? Probably not.
What really got to me though, was an earlier post.
On April 15, Cody posted on her wall “[she] thinks Kenny Bush can go to hell.”
(For those who do not know who Kenny Bush is, he is one of our columnists and sometimes can have a strong opinion.)
Again, I am all for freedom of speech and the ability to criticize something that you do not agree with, but this is taking it a step too far.
As the SGA president (and please listen, Demario Jones) you should maintain a certain level of professionalism, and, Kelli, you have not demonstrated that.
If there is something you do not like we are always accepting Letters to the Editor or even a discreet e-mail expressing your dissatisfaction. I have had only one exchange of e-mails with Kelli in September of 2009, and only one letter was submitted and published promptly afterward. I have not received anything else since.
If The Spectator is such “a waste of trees” and Kenny’s opinion struck you ill, then I would have liked to give you the opportunity to back up your opinion, in a venue that reflects a certain level of professionalism. But you thought Facebook seemed like a better place to do it.
I will admit, I would have not know about any of this if it was not brought to my attention, and honestly I would not have said anything if it was just the post about The Spectator as a whole, but do not get me confused, I WILL support my writers and posts like “Kenny Bush can go to hell” is in no way acceptable for a person in your position.
I am not going to put you under the microscope and point out every little thing that went wrong during your presidency; that would be unfair and unprofessional.
It is hard to lead a group of people with different ideas and values; I know this firsthand, and it is an accomplishment in itself to get one thing done, but I would never take my opinion to a social networking site, and backhandedly criticize someone else.
The bottom line is show some professionalism and dignity and address your concerns in a public venue, as you are a public figure, not through your Facebook.
I really hope this resonates with the next president.

Check Also

Blazers run past Bears in home opener

For the second straight year, the Blazers put over 100 points on the Clinton College ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *